The resolution of the Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta (IIMC), the approval of Human Resource Development (HRD) Ministry’s decision to tax reduction. A party of officers and some members of the Faculty have questions about the legality of the resolution seriously regard the date only a few days before the Supreme Court, the electoral process and uncertainties.

The Faculty of IIMC has a resolution of its own chairman of the board that Mr. Deveshwar is aware that the legality of the 164 Meeting on March 26, 2004 has been questioned during the meeting and even later. The decision of the IIM, Bangalore does not allow inadmissible in session replacement with another type of institutional response. The Faculty of clarifications should consider whether the fee cut, to actually lie IIMC.

The Faculty resolving issues such as VR-president would have such a decision, if the case is sub judice and the Supreme Court took a new public interest litigation, because the government of India was not ready for a written commitment on the autonomy of IIMS.