The Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad (IIM-A), in an affidavit filed before the Supreme Court on Tuesday, has said that the unilateral decision of the Union ministry of human resources development regarding fees to be charged by IIMs does not seem to be a step in the right direction.

The affidavit, filed after the apex court served notices to the six IIMs on April 8, asking them to clarify their stand on the fee-cut issue, puts on record the IIM-A’s willingness to sort out the issue through a process of dialogue.

“We have not gone to the court proactively. The affidavit places our views on record in answer to the notice and not filing it would have limited our options. We are, however, not a party to the PIL,” said a source in the IIM-A.

The affidavit has three components - the Position Paper prepared by the faculty, the resolutions passed by the IIM-A Society and the Board of Governors recently, and the fact that the institute is in a process of dialogue with the ministry.

Dons feel that the affidavit clarifying the institute’s willingness for a dialogue will create an atmosphere that will help the process initiated by chairman NR Narayanamurthy during the board meeting here on April 3.

The affidavit said the fee-reduction order has to be seen not in isolation, but in the larger context of many other decisions by the ministry that threatened the autonomy of the institute.

It has also said that the notification on fee reduction “violates the time-honoured process of the fee being decided by the Board of Governors and that it is not necessary to reduce fees to make management education more affordable to the less well-to-do sections of the society.”

Meanwhile, the Indian Institute of Management-Calcutta faculty council filed an application before the Supreme Court, praying for an order impleading it as a respondent in the fee-cut case already pending before the apex court.

Faculty members of the Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta, have decided to wait until the Supreme Court order, it is accessible from Monday, before a decision on their future.

Given that the next consultation, if ever, in July-end, many faculty members are of the opinion that the situation could change in their favour as Murli Manohar Joshi can no longer, as before the MHRD minister after the elections.

The SC has governed IIMS MHRD and the opening of a dialogue on the issue of fees helm. If it is not sorted it, the SC to hear the case again in mid-July.

“We commend the Tribunal. We hope that reason MHRD’ll see what we tried to explain our position and application, we in the head of jurisdiction, “said Ashish Bhattacharya, IIM-C Dean of the planning and management.

The Faculty will be held on April 22 to discuss as much tax should be charged from new students, letters of admission until May the second week.

THE faculty council of the Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta (IIM-C) on Monday decided to move the Calcutta High Court challenging the validity of the 164th meeting of the board of governors, which took place on March 26, 2004.

Prof Asish Bhattacharyya, Dean (Planning & Administration) and spokesperson of the faculty council, told newspersons that the validity of the said meeting was being called into question since four members had been replaced or substituted just before the crucial meeting to decide on the fee cut issue.

The council has also recommended that the Director of the institute provisionally maintain the fee structure for the forthcoming session, which begins in May.

Prof Bhattacharyya said that the council has suggested that since the board of governors has not been able to take a decision on fee reduction as directed by the Union HRD Ministry, the continuation of the same fee structure was advisable in view of smooth functioning of the institute as per the curriculum.

In the just concluded two-year session, IIM-C had charged a total of around Rs 2.5 lakh. The payments were obtained in various stages. The initial payment was around Rs 48,000.

“We have also suggested to the Director, who was present at the council meeting today, that fee received in excess of what might be finally decided by the board of governors or the Supreme Court be refunded with interest to the students.”

Prof Bhattacharyya also said that it has been the practice at IIM-C that before every session the faculty would recommend the fee structure and the board would take it up for approval. The council has also suggested that the Director, in the absence of clarity, might keep aside the Central Government’s proposed grant of Rs 4 crore for 2003-04 on account of non-Plan expenditure.

“The fund has not come in yet. But if it comes, the council advises that it should not be used until the matter is resolved by the Supreme Court or through a process of dialogue.” Meanwhile, the IIM-C faculty council has requested the Ministry that it be included in the process of dialogue on the fee revision issue.

The council has decided to form a three-member committee consisting of two faculty members and one alumnus for the proposed dialogue.

Calcutta: It’s management practices rather than a me-combat. Faculty members of the Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta, want the status quo on tuition fees will be maintained at least for the next academic year.

Faculty members say that the Institute of authorization to issue letters of a fresh cargo of students from next week, in which tuition fees must be clearly indicated.

The decision of the IIM-C’s Faculty meeting on Monday, is a clear defiance framed by resolution YC Deveshwar, president of the IIM-C’s Board of Governors.

The President of the European Union has HRD ministry bar annual fee of 1.25 lakh RS RS 30000

“Given that tuition fees should be clear to new students, the Council may decide that the fees issue and negotiate director Shekhar Chowdhury. We also proposed that the segregated funds, where money may be filed. If the fee is to bar the Apex court, we students money back with interest “, Ashish Bhattacharya, IIM-C-dean of planning and management said.

The director is expected to inform the Board of Governors of the Council decision. The Council also approved the decision of the ability to move high court on Tuesday.

It is responsible for the HRD ministry of the decision on their own people to participate in the 164 Board of Governors’ meeting, on March 26 are available in some members of origin. A new teams up with a Alumnus and two members the ability to ensure that the HRD ministry has initiated a dialogue with members of the Faculty in the bar fees discussion. “The Supreme Court, the ministry believes that discussions with the IIMS to solve the problem of honoraria. In case of IIM-C, the Board of Directors and members have the option of opposing view and, therefore, we ask that the Ministry held separate discussions, “Bhattacharya added.

The Council said that the RS 4 crore kitty sent by the Observatory at low tide on any deficit are not currently used. “We believe it is in a separate account and can not handle now. We will wait until the Supreme Court to take a decision on the question that we decide how it is used,” said Bhattacharya.

Calcutta: Indian Institute of Management Calcutta (IIM-C) on its faculty at the 22nd session of the Council a letter dated April past Alumnus of IIM Ahmedabad Vipin Gupta, an original by the applicant against the Union PIL Department of Resource Development Human IIM’s helm for tuition of 1.50 lakh RS RS 30000, IIMC dean of planning and management, Ashish Bhattacharyya said.

The positive side is the meaning of the Court that, finally, is the centre of a dialogue with IIMS on fresh cut and autonomy.

“The key expectations reaffirming the institutional autonomy and limitation of financial dependence by the Indian government, so that money can be used in more pressure on primary education and gender equality Empowerment areas, “the letter said.

IIM-C faculty members have received the letter on Saturday.

Gupta’s letter, however, is stuffed with complains that the decision of the IIM-A to plead for a postponement had disrupted plans. “For this reason, all three IIMS lost their chances to obtain a guarantee of a stay in order to cut the tax,” the letter said.

He also criticized the proposal IIMA that during the current fee of Rs 1.50 lakh would be borne by students in the new session, RS 1.20 lakh aside at a level of trust that are returned, for students, for cases where the Tribunal has ordered an additional finally withdrew.

Such a trust can not, in the memorandum, associations, that the Constitution introduces the IIMS, writing said.

“He has a strong precedent for the issue of unilateral MHRD orders against the autonomy IIMS,” said the letter.

Bhattacharyya felt the best way forward was to maintain the status quo on cutting costs and reconciliation.

“The SC not to stay the implementation fees of about cutting the scene. On the other side not to consult IIMA IIMB and not a tax increase set as MHRD RS 30000. IIMS It can then decide fees for the academic year, “he said.

“The seat of medical costs Rs 27 lakh. Sir, these 27 lakhs, Kuch Earlier ho sakta hai (it may be reduced)? So, the dialogue between the team this Web site Newspapers and PT Deshmukh, director of Terna Public Charitable Trust, managed by Padamsinh Patil, Maharashtra’s powerful minister of irrigation.

Given that negotiations for admission to the Terna Medical College to consider a slight June morning, the principal invited the team of the offer.

“It is Rs 32 lakh in a few days to wait,” said Deshmukh.

What Maharashtra there to flourish is a subversion of laws by many medical techniques and private universities, which merely selling their seats at most.

Regulatory authorities? You’re not yet worked. The government? Many of the state technical and medical universities by the same ministers and deputies responsible for regulating the fees. Merit lists centralised authorisation? Do not worry. At the university as Terna, only 50 per cent pay and that your seat is guaranteed.

Like most bazaars, the only thing that talks is money. The investigation team, equipped with hidden cameras, were received in four colleges in Navi Mumbai, without appointments, contact lists, or any obstacles to negotiate with outsourcers (difficult for medical care, simply Engineering).

The fig leaf behind which a large number of 137 engineers and 17 private higher education institutions private medical _ they admit, about 2 lakh students _ hide December 2002, a Supreme Court judge that the cost-free control of the Status. But the Court also said package fees are illegal, bars and colleges “greed”.

But for many colleges, the judgement of the Court of Justice, it seems, exists only on paper.

Higher education institutions now have a private tariff structure to two authorities, after stopping December to settle, engineering and medical training.

The Medical Education Regulatory Authority (Mera) and educational institutions Regulatory Authority (EIRA) were by a government whose ministers and MPs do not believe that their control over the state of medical technology and higher education creates a conflict of interest.

Take Industries Minister Patangrao Kadam, whose college was one of those studied. It was in a subcommittee development of diplomas of higher education, politics, after the Supreme Court decision.

“All fees must be EIRA, universities must also explain” AD Sawant, EIRA secretary, said the newspaper this site. “Some universities have engineering costs 60000 R R 1 lakh for the management quota of seats. Fees should not be more than this. ”

But the investigation team found colleges recharging station RS RS 4 lakh to 10 lakh. Of course, the specialized high schools are simply not worth the authorities. Sawant warned that if costs are higher than approving, colleges, having to pay refunds