It will make wonders, but the fact is that tuition at the University of Delhi (DU) remained the same for over six decades.

“Each day, students pay R 30 for a cup of coffee and R 10 for cars, parking. But the monthly charges remained in the studies R 15 and R 18 for Undergraduate and Graduate Programs, and since 1938,” said Vice-Chancellor Deepak Nayyar YOU.

“How long lunch is also available?” he asked. Nayyar standpoint, it is a necessity for the university, their fee structure.

Several students have said they are not just the idea of a tax hike. Given the general increase in income and standard of living, English (Honours), the first year student at St. Stephen’s, Sushmit Sarkar, that higher education was made “at affordable prices” today.

“The university lean costs appear in the report on the” obscenely high fees, some private schools and institutions of the loading operation. Those who can not afford more money for higher education, “he said.

Bemerkte Anjalli Ravi Kumar, a second-year MBA student at the Faculty of Economics of the company: “There is no doubt that we pay much less than what we are able, are willing to pay” . To say that the tuition increases is a step in the right direction, but she stressed that the University must be sensitive to students from lower layers during economic structure of the new taxes.

With the consistent view, Tripti Parule a final-year student in journalism at Kalindi College, said: “We should not lose sight of the fundamental principle of education for all”. “She suggested that the new fee structure is divided into categories based on different income groups.” The section should be financially weak surrender of fees monitoring of subsidies on other weaknesses in the economic hierarchy, “said Parule.

While supporting the idea of a concession for the most weak, the dean of students’ welfare, YOU, Hema Raghavan warned that “things on a silver platter should not lead to assess” . She explains: “In addition to subsidies, we are introducing innovations” Earn while-you-learning “for the disadvantaged section, they can target employees within the university or institution for the plaintiffs’ employment, as a reserve audit in libraries,… In this way, they are aware of the value of grants them. ”

However, there is a section of the community of students - and an influential political in one - to resist any form of movements in the direction of increased fees. The Delhi University Students’ Union (DUSU) would protest against such an approach, “said DUSU President Nakul Bhardwaj. “Almost 70% of students come from lower-middle class families and even a minimum increase of costs, they can have effects,” he said.

Recognizing that the tax revision “can not be dictated by ‘, but by reflection, consultation and consensus,” Nayyar said: “We must ensure that those who can not afford, not only do not pay, but receive full fees - Liberation. ”

He added: “Universities are now functioning serious resource crunch.Higher education should be financed by the government. Universities should be completed by this attempt at mobilization of resources. “

NEW DELHI: It has proved to be a surprise, but it is a fact that tuition at the University of Delhi (DU), has remained the same for more than six decades.

“Every day, students pay Rs 30 for a cup of coffee and R 10 for cars. But tuition monthly remaining Rs 15 and Rs 18 for Graduate and Undergraduate Programs, and since 1938,” said DU Vice-Chancellor Deepak Nayyar.
“How long lunch available?” Wunderte he said. Nayyar standpoint, it is a necessity for the university, its tariff structure.

Several students have said, they are not just the idea of a tax hike. Given the general increase in income and living standards, an English (Honours), first year student of St. Stephen’s, Sushmit Sarkar, believes that higher education has been provided at affordable prices. ”
“The university and college fees appear in the report the meager” obscene fees high, but a few private schools and institutions of the loading process. Those who can afford it, it should be more money for education higher, “he said.
Bemerkte Anjalli Ravi Kumar, a second-year MBA student at the Faculty of Management Studies, “There is no doubt that we are paying much less than what we are able to pay.” Saying that the increase in tuition is a step in the right direction, but she stressed that the University must be sensitive to students from lower layers, while the economic design of the new pricing structure.

With the concurring Tripti Parule believe, a final year journalism student at Kalindi College, said: “We should not lose sight of the fundamental principle of education for all.” “She proposed that the new fee schedule proceedings are classified on the basis of different income groups.” Section should be financially weak surrender of fees monitoring subsidies for other sections of the weakness Economic hierarchy, “said Parule.
Supports like the idea of the concession for the weaker party, the dean of students, welfare, YOU, Hema Raghavan warned that “things on a silver platter may not be classified.” She explains: “In addition to these grants, we are introducing innovations’ earn-while-you-learn” for the less advantaged sectors section they can target employees in the scope of the university or university for jobseekers, such as registration of storage in libraries, etc. Thus, they are aware that the value of the grants to them. ”

But it is a part of the community of students - and politically influential, that - the leadership of a movement to the increase in charges. The Delhi University Students’ Union (DUSU) would protest against such a move, “said DUSU president Nakul Bhardwaj. “Nearly 70% of students come from the lower-middle class, families and even a minimal tax increase may have a negative influence Indeed, he argues.

Recognizing that the costs of revision “can not be dictated by this, but by reflection, consultation and consensus,” Nayyar said: “We must ensure that those who can not afford, not only not to pay, but receive an honorarium of complete liberation. ”

He added: “The universities are now in operation serious resource crunch.Higher education should be financed by the government. Universities should try to mobilize these resources. “