Prospective and current graduate business students who used a Web site to cheat on entrance examinations over the last five years could have their scores thrown out.

The exam’s publisher, the Graduate Management Admission Council, is tracking down users of Scoretop.com after winning a lawsuit to shut down the site and seize a computer hard drive containing payment information and user identifications.

Scoretop sold VIP access for $30 a month, giving users previews to current questions on the latest Graduate Management Admission Test. Some were posted by users after taking the exam.

U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema also ordered site operator Lei Shi to pay $2.35 million plus legal costs in a June 20 ruling in the copyright infringement lawsuit.

In court documents, GMAC cited a posting by a user who said the information offered on the site was “inestimable,” saying that he saw 10 to 12 “word by word” items and “many of the other questions felt very familiar.”

About 6,000 GMAT scores from when the Web site started in 2003 to the present are in question, GMAC spokeswoman Judy Phair said Wednesday. It’s unclear how many test-takers are involved, because they can take the test several times a year.

“We have an ethical responsibility to schools and students to say this is a secure and fair test,” Phair said. “Obviously, you’re not being fair if you have an unfair advantage.”

The council plans to match data with test-takers and cancel the scores of anyone it determines knowingly used Scoretop to cheat on the GMAT. It will also notify the schools receiving scores, and perhaps prevent them from retaking the test. Phair said she can’t offer a timetable on the process.

Shi wasn’t represented by an attorney, according to court documents. McLean, Va.-based GMAC said Shi has returned to his native China and couldn’t be reached.

More : ap.google.com

Kolkata, April 8. Faculty members of the Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta (IIM-C) are companies in their opposition to the Union Human Resource Development Ministry’s move to reduce taxes.

Prof. Asish K. Bhattacharyya, Dean (planning and management) of IIM-C and spokesperson of the Faculty, told Business Line, the Faculty of the opinion that the tax was cut under the autonomy of the Institute, which is registered by the association as a body independent, and not a hotel.

Professor Bhattacharyya said that there is an option of the Faculty, have resorted to legal measures. “We are considering all options. The judicial process is not a privileged, but we are obliged for such a measure as a major group of IIM-C,” he says. ”

“We also ask, Mr YC Deveshwar, president of the Governing Council on its draft resolution on reducing fees. IIM-C Faculty strongly believes that the Department of command on the subject was not a” mandatory “At the Institute. Approval for the new session at the IIM-C would begin in late May or early April.

Mr. Deveshwar, it is scheduled for April 16 Faculty.

In addition, the Supreme Court today directed all six IIMS to submit their comments on the issue of reducing costs by 16 April. The summit also court fixed the hearing of the public interest litigation on the subject, the same day. IIM-C response to the Supreme Court directive on the fee reduction would be completed early next week, according to the Institute of sources.

Prof. Bhattacharyya said: “We are discovering, through legal formalities, if we ever move the court”.

Regarding the issue of autonomy of the Faculty representatives pointed out that the memorandum of freedom of association and rules of IIM-C had clearly stated that “the general superintendence, direction and control over business of society (IIM-C-Gesellschaft) their income and property is vested benefits to the board of directors of the company, which bears the name “Board of Governors.”

The Faculty Council has estimated that the chairman of the Board of Governors, has been specially assigned by which they make, the resolution, Mr. Deveshwar could not as a “compromise” the autonomy of the committee. “The Institute of revenue, academic freedom, decisions concerning the students’ teacher-report and the curricula could not part of the area of the state,” he observed.

Prof. Bhattacharyya also pointed out that the IIM-C Faculty had a position paper of the Government in question to move in a reduction of taxes and the question of autonomy over a month ago, was the distribution to the officers.

Faculty members of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta are occupied, legal advice five days before the Supreme Court against the European Union human resource development ministry, said Ashis Bhattacharyya, IIMC’s din of the planning and management.

The Tribunal is currently head PIL consultation has been suggested that the HRD with the Ministry’s decision to bar tuition annual R-IIMS lakh from 1.5 to 30 RS 000 The Faculty IIMC appears in SC On 16 April.

The Faculty IIMC was against the tax bar because she thought it would have on the autonomy of the university.

IIMC faculty members and institutions in Bangalore and Ahmedabad felt the Boards of Governors decides on tuition fees of these institutions, which are not MHRD.

The PIL in SC was filed by some ex-students and academics from the Faculty of IIMA the Faculty IIMC decided to party. In search of the rights of the expertise of the Faculty IIMC are not subject to lawyers only in the city. “We started talking about some jurists high level in New Delhi, Mumbai and Bangalore, man, regularly take up cases of the SC,” a senior Faculty said.

“The SC, after consulting the PIL, on 8 April has sought the opinion of the IIMS. But IIMS Lucknow, Indore and Kozhikode Calcutta at the offices of governors, a resolution supporting the tax cut, despite l ‘opposition of the Faculty. And it review committees have been searched, “said the panel members.

The Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad (IIM-A), in an affidavit filed before the Supreme Court on Tuesday, has said that the unilateral decision of the Union ministry of human resources development regarding fees to be charged by IIMs does not seem to be a step in the right direction.

The affidavit, filed after the apex court served notices to the six IIMs on April 8, asking them to clarify their stand on the fee-cut issue, puts on record the IIM-A’s willingness to sort out the issue through a process of dialogue.

“We have not gone to the court proactively. The affidavit places our views on record in answer to the notice and not filing it would have limited our options. We are, however, not a party to the PIL,” said a source in the IIM-A.

The affidavit has three components - the Position Paper prepared by the faculty, the resolutions passed by the IIM-A Society and the Board of Governors recently, and the fact that the institute is in a process of dialogue with the ministry.

Dons feel that the affidavit clarifying the institute’s willingness for a dialogue will create an atmosphere that will help the process initiated by chairman NR Narayanamurthy during the board meeting here on April 3.

The affidavit said the fee-reduction order has to be seen not in isolation, but in the larger context of many other decisions by the ministry that threatened the autonomy of the institute.

It has also said that the notification on fee reduction “violates the time-honoured process of the fee being decided by the Board of Governors and that it is not necessary to reduce fees to make management education more affordable to the less well-to-do sections of the society.”

Meanwhile, the Indian Institute of Management-Calcutta faculty council filed an application before the Supreme Court, praying for an order impleading it as a respondent in the fee-cut case already pending before the apex court.

Faculty members of the Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta, have decided to wait until the Supreme Court order, it is accessible from Monday, before a decision on their future.

Given that the next consultation, if ever, in July-end, many faculty members are of the opinion that the situation could change in their favour as Murli Manohar Joshi can no longer, as before the MHRD minister after the elections.

The SC has governed IIMS MHRD and the opening of a dialogue on the issue of fees helm. If it is not sorted it, the SC to hear the case again in mid-July.

“We commend the Tribunal. We hope that reason MHRD’ll see what we tried to explain our position and application, we in the head of jurisdiction, “said Ashish Bhattacharya, IIM-C Dean of the planning and management.

The Faculty will be held on April 22 to discuss as much tax should be charged from new students, letters of admission until May the second week.

THE faculty council of the Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta (IIM-C) on Monday decided to move the Calcutta High Court challenging the validity of the 164th meeting of the board of governors, which took place on March 26, 2004.

Prof Asish Bhattacharyya, Dean (Planning & Administration) and spokesperson of the faculty council, told newspersons that the validity of the said meeting was being called into question since four members had been replaced or substituted just before the crucial meeting to decide on the fee cut issue.

The council has also recommended that the Director of the institute provisionally maintain the fee structure for the forthcoming session, which begins in May.

Prof Bhattacharyya said that the council has suggested that since the board of governors has not been able to take a decision on fee reduction as directed by the Union HRD Ministry, the continuation of the same fee structure was advisable in view of smooth functioning of the institute as per the curriculum.

In the just concluded two-year session, IIM-C had charged a total of around Rs 2.5 lakh. The payments were obtained in various stages. The initial payment was around Rs 48,000.

“We have also suggested to the Director, who was present at the council meeting today, that fee received in excess of what might be finally decided by the board of governors or the Supreme Court be refunded with interest to the students.”

Prof Bhattacharyya also said that it has been the practice at IIM-C that before every session the faculty would recommend the fee structure and the board would take it up for approval. The council has also suggested that the Director, in the absence of clarity, might keep aside the Central Government’s proposed grant of Rs 4 crore for 2003-04 on account of non-Plan expenditure.

“The fund has not come in yet. But if it comes, the council advises that it should not be used until the matter is resolved by the Supreme Court or through a process of dialogue.” Meanwhile, the IIM-C faculty council has requested the Ministry that it be included in the process of dialogue on the fee revision issue.

The council has decided to form a three-member committee consisting of two faculty members and one alumnus for the proposed dialogue.

Calcutta: Indian Institute of Management Calcutta (IIM-C) on its faculty at the 22nd session of the Council a letter dated April past Alumnus of IIM Ahmedabad Vipin Gupta, an original by the applicant against the Union PIL Department of Resource Development Human IIM’s helm for tuition of 1.50 lakh RS RS 30000, IIMC dean of planning and management, Ashish Bhattacharyya said.

The positive side is the meaning of the Court that, finally, is the centre of a dialogue with IIMS on fresh cut and autonomy.

“The key expectations reaffirming the institutional autonomy and limitation of financial dependence by the Indian government, so that money can be used in more pressure on primary education and gender equality Empowerment areas, “the letter said.

IIM-C faculty members have received the letter on Saturday.

Gupta’s letter, however, is stuffed with complains that the decision of the IIM-A to plead for a postponement had disrupted plans. “For this reason, all three IIMS lost their chances to obtain a guarantee of a stay in order to cut the tax,” the letter said.

He also criticized the proposal IIMA that during the current fee of Rs 1.50 lakh would be borne by students in the new session, RS 1.20 lakh aside at a level of trust that are returned, for students, for cases where the Tribunal has ordered an additional finally withdrew.

Such a trust can not, in the memorandum, associations, that the Constitution introduces the IIMS, writing said.

“He has a strong precedent for the issue of unilateral MHRD orders against the autonomy IIMS,” said the letter.

Bhattacharyya felt the best way forward was to maintain the status quo on cutting costs and reconciliation.

“The SC not to stay the implementation fees of about cutting the scene. On the other side not to consult IIMA IIMB and not a tax increase set as MHRD RS 30000. IIMS It can then decide fees for the academic year, “he said.

Calcutta, April 28. The Faculty Council of Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta Wednesday a petition filed petition before the Calcutta High Court against the validity of the Board of Governors meeting on March 26 had allegedly authorized the Board Chair to take a decision in the issue of fee cut. The tax was revising down by the Union Ministry of Human Resource Development in the six IIMS.

The petition is limited to the validity of the meeting and not the accuracy and validity of fresh cut mandate of the ministry, such as the case is pending before the Supreme Court.

The Faculty written petition took note of the situation, data showed on Thursday that, when appointing members on board and the appointment instead of the representative of European Union members absent government allegedly acted in violation of the rules of the IIM-C.

T. Justice Meena Kumari, a judge of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh on Saturday, preferably privatization of electrical distribution was to be done, as in the case of electricity generation.

“This may be another reform,” she said recalling that some countries were already familiar with the concept a try. She said that if countries are experimenting with the concept has been a great success, has been replicated by others for a competitive and efficient distribution system.

The judge was the conclusion of providing the service of God sends to the two-day UGC-sponsored national seminar on “Power reforms: challenges and strategies” in the SV-university, under the auspices of the Department of Management Studies .

She described the transmission and distribution (T & D) as the worst defeats in spite of staggering Indian power scene, as it does about 22 per cent, against the world qualifying standard of around 7 per cent.

She said the problem was compounded by the use of “primitive” and voltage transformers tension which is obsolete waste and damage accessories. The judge felt in this context, over the medium-Power Research Institute (CPRI), Bangalore, had a very decisive role in resolving the problem by providing high-voltage direct current (HGÜ). T. Siddaiah, Head, Department of Management Studies, CSR presidency. V.R.C. Krishnaiah, Department of Law, welcomed guests at the seminar director, p. Durga Rao, a proposal for a vote of thanks.